Pullis v. Pullis Bros. Iron Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Oitj Circuit Court. — Son. James F. Withrow, Judge. (1) On appeal from an order of the trial court in refusing to revoke the appointment of a receiver, this court will review the entire record, and determine therefrom whether there was any ground upon which the receiver should have been appointed or upon which the court should have refused to revoke the appointment, as the case may be.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Oitj Circuit Court. — Son. James F. Withrow, Judge. (1) On appeal from an order of the trial court in refusing to revoke the appointment of a receiver, this court will review the entire record, and determine therefrom whether there was any ground upon which the receiver should have been appointed or upon which the court should have refused to revoke the appointment, as the case may be. Merriam v. Railroad, 136 Mo. 145; Glover v. Investment Co., 138 Mo. 408. (2) “It is fundamental that, to authorize a receiver, the plaintiff must show that he has a right either to the…
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, J.
TKis is an appeal under tbe Act of 1895 (Laws 1895, p. 91) from an order of tbe circuit court of the city of St. Louis refusing to revoke an interlocutory order appointing a receiver.
Tbe vital matters in .controversy can be more readily grasped by a chronological statement of tbe facts, pleadings ' and proceedings.
Prior to and on March 25,1896, tbe Pullis Brothers Iron Company was a Missouri corporation, engaged in the manufacture of iron for architectural purposes. It owned a single plant on the comer of Eighth and Hickory streets, composed of a main building located on and covering…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Progress Press Brick & Machine Co. v. Gratiot Brick & Quarry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Martin v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Geist v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Harrington v. FortnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Lee v. KaiserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hooven, Owens & Rentschler, Co. v. John Featherstone's SonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Cantwell v. Columbia Lead Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- United Cemeteries Co. v. StrotherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- Lanyon v. ChesneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- State Ex Rel. Calhoun v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.