Bauer v. Bauer

under NRS 125.150(7), the court could not grant respondent a new form of relief by awarding alimony for school expenses under NRS 125.150(9). See NRS 125.150(1), (7); see generally NRCP 8 (explaining that claims for relief should be set forward in a pleading); Five Star Capital Corp. v. Ruby, 124 Nev. 1048, 1054-55,

194 P.3d 709, 713

(2008) (providing that claim preclusion applies to all grounds of recovery that were or could have been brought in the first case) Thus, because the district court lacked authority to grant respondent a new form of alimony under NRS 125.150(9), we reverse the…