Legal Opinion

United States v. Miguel Felix-Jerez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 16, 1982No. 81-1121Published

1Opinion of the Court

667 F.2d 1297

9 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1452

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Miguel FELIX-JEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 81-1121.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 10, 1981.

Decided Feb. 16, 1982.

Bernardo Velasco, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Tucson, Ariz., argued, for defendant-appellant; Frank R. Zapata, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Tucson, Ariz., on brief.

Jon R. Cooper, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.

Before SKELTON* and KILKENNY, Senior Judges,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Deery v. CraySupreme Court of the United States · 1867

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API