Legal Opinion

Gaynor v. Magoun

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 15, 1940No. 45295PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

There is but one error assigned — that of overruling plaintiff’s motion for continuance and dismissing plaintiff’s cause of action. The law governing a party’s right to a continuance is well settled and requires no citation of authorities. A motion for a continuance is addressed peculiarly to the sound legal discretion of the court and will not be interfered with on appeal unless the supreme court is clearly satisfied that this discretion has been abused and injustice thereby done. With this rule in mind, let us look at the situation presented by the record in this case.

In substance, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berg v. BergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  2. Johnson v. KeirSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  3. Johnson v. LeeseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dingman v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  2. Madison Silos, Division of Martin Marietta Corp. v. WassomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. State v. One Certain AutomobileSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  4. In Re Estate of TominSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  5. Equitable Life Insurance v. CondonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API