Legal Opinion
Remington Arms Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 27, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-420-JLLPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Remington Arms Company (“Remington”) seeks a declaratory judgment as to whether comprehensive general liability policies and first layer excess insurance policies issued by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty Mutual”) require Liberty Mutual to defend and indemnify Remington in actions brought against Remington by the federal and state governments and private parties for environmental contamination at three Remington sites in Connecticut. Remington also seeks damages arising from Liberty Mutual’s refusal to defend and indemnify Remington…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Somportex Limited v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum Corporation v. Brewster, Leeds & Co., Inc. And M. S. International, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Field v. Volkswagenwerk AGCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Terra Nova Insurance Company, Ltd. v. 900 Bar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- McDowell Oil Service, Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Ronson v. TalesnickDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Worster-Sims v. Tropicana Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.