Legal Opinion

United States v. Lata

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 24, 2005No. 04-2051PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOUDIN, Chief Judge.

The appeal in this case presents the question whether a defendant who committed a crime and was sentenced prior to United States v. Booker, — U.S. ——, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), can be given a sentence that is within the statutory maximum but higher than the sentence that he would normally have received (absent departures) under the mandatory guideline regime. We conclude, without difficulty, that the ex post facto clause of the Constitution is not offended by this result; and, on the present facts, no due process -objection to the higher sentence can be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. NataleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. United States v. Ofray-CamposCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  3. Gonzalez-Fuentes v. MolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Derek A. Vaughn, Zaza Leslie LindoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API