Legal Opinion

State v. Teasley

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 2002No. 27323PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUTIERREZ, Judge.

A jury found Patricia Marie Teasley guilty as an accessory for harboring a felon, Idaho Code § 18-205. Teasley appeals, arguing the district court erred by incorrectly instructing the jury on the elements for a charge of harboring a felon and by failing to instruct the jury regarding Teasley’s right to require a valid search warrant. Teasley also argues it was error to admit evidence of Teasley’s prior bad act and that the accumulation of errors in the trial prevented Teasley from having a fair trial. We affirm Teasley’s judgment of conviction.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Teas…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. RhodeIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. MerwinIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. HawkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. HumpherysIdaho Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HauserIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. State v. Leroy S. WilskeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. State v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. MillerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Garcia-Morales v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API