Legal Opinion

Estate of Orsatti v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided February 10, 1949No. Docket No. 13466PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Arundell, Judge’.

The principal issue between the parties is whether, under the facts in the instant case, payments made by decedent to his wife pursuant to the property settlement agreement incident to their divorce were “periodic” or “installment” payments within the meaning of section 22 (k) of the Internal Revenue Code.1 The de-ductibility of these payments by decedent under section 23 (u) 2 rests upon the determination of this issue.

Petitioners point to the fact that under the agreement herein the total amount which decedent was obligated to pay was contingent upon the death or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Steinel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948
  2. Lee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Smith's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  2. Fleming v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  3. Herbert v. RiddellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
  4. Kent v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  5. Casey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API