Legal Opinion

Heyman v. Stopper

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 10, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On appeal from the Second District Court of the city of Newark.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Voorhees, J.

This is an appeal from the Second District Court of Newark. The point raised is that the statute of frauds, with reference to a reai estate broker’s commissions, does not permit a recovery by the agents under the facts set forth in this case.

The statute of frauds was undoubtedly an act for the benefit of real estate owners. It provides that “No person selling land for the owner shall be entitled to commissions unless (a) the authority for selling is in writing, signed by the owner; (b) the authority of the broker to make a sale is…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morrill v. BarnesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Vaccaro v. SautaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
  3. Laderman v. Passaic National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. Mercner v. FayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API