Heyman v. Stopper
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the Second District Court of the city of Newark.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Voorhees, J.
This is an appeal from the Second District Court of Newark. The point raised is that the statute of frauds, with reference to a reai estate broker’s commissions, does not permit a recovery by the agents under the facts set forth in this case.
The statute of frauds was undoubtedly an act for the benefit of real estate owners. It provides that “No person selling land for the owner shall be entitled to commissions unless (a) the authority for selling is in writing, signed by the owner; (b) the authority of the broker to make a sale is…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Morrill v. BarnesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Vaccaro v. SautaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- Laderman v. Passaic National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Mercner v. FayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962