Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Geiger

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 9, 2008No. 2007AP95PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, P.J.

¶ 1. Gerard and Kelly Geiger and Bruce and Ellen Gilbert own adjoining parcels of lakefront property in Iron county. The Geigers appeal from a judgment resolving a boundary dispute in favor of the Gilberts. The Geigers contend the trial court erred in: (1) finding the property deeds ambiguous and resorting to extrinsic evidence to determine the parties' intent, (2) concluding what the parties' intent was, and (3) entering a declaratory judgment in the Gilberts' favor without exploring reformation of the legal description.

¶ 2. We conclude that the two deeds' metes and bounds language, although…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Auto Title Loans, Inc. v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Jones v. JenkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Atkinson v. MentzelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  4. Elofrson v. LindsayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Rikkers v. RyanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grygiel v. Monches Fish & Game Club, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Konneker v. RomanoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Konneker v. RomanoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API