Legal Opinion

O'Neill's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 1905No. Appeal, No. 78PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 78, Oct. T., 1905, by Peter H. Corr, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., Jan. T., 1904, No. 544, sustaining exceptions to adjudication in estate of Hugh A. O’Neill, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was decree sustaining the exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Morrison, J.,

May 28, 1896, Peter H. Corr, appellant, caused a writ of summons to 'issue out of court of common pleas No. 1, of Philadelphia county, as of No. 231, June Term, 1896, against Hugh A. O’Neill and one John J. McCloskey, trading as H. A. O’Neill & Company, to recover money due on promissory notes and for money lent in 1895. This summons was served on McCloskey, but returned as to O’Neill, nihil habet. On June 12, 1896, a copy of the plaintiff’s statement of-claim was served on O’Neill, and an affidavit of service is filed of record. Nothing further was done until March 27,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kittera's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
  2. McClurg v. Fryer & AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
  3. Curcier's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daly v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API