Legal Opinion
Barnes v. Yand
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 16, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00389Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00389-DAD-SAB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSING CERTAIN 13 v. CLAIMS 14 W. YAND, et al., (ECF No. 9) 15 Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 16 17 Antoine Deshawn Barnes (“Plaintiff) is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this 18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first 19 amended complaint, filed on April 14, 2020. 20 I. 21 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 22 The Court is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.