Legal Opinion
State v. Romano
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 29, 1973PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacDonald, J.
The defendant, Carmelo 0. Romano, was found guilty by a jury of the crimes of pool selling in violation of § 53-295 of the General Statutes, destruction of property in violation of § 54-33e, and interference with search in violation of § 54-33d. In his appeal from the judgment rendered on the verdict, he has assigned as error (1) the court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence; (2) two rulings on the admissibility of evidence; and (3) the denial of his motion to set aside the verdict as against the evidence.
The defendant’s first assignment of error, the denial of his pretrial motion to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. James L. HarperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. BemberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. AcquinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. AnnunziatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. DeChamplainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.