Legal Opinion

Jones v. Spindel

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1970No. 45282PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Presiding Judge.

1. The defendants assert error on the admission in evidence of an agreement by Modular Components, Inc., to indemnify Curtis Homes and others for certain uses of Spindel’s plans. Assuming the general objection made at the time to be sufficient, this document, when considered with the testimony of a witness for the defendants who executed the agreement for Modular Components, discloses a possible bias of this witness in the outcome of the litigation, and was admissible as a matter affecting his credibility.

2. The tenth enumeration is based on an excerpt from the charge…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beaver v. MagidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  2. Jones v. SpindelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hospital Authority v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  2. Jones v. SpindelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. U-Haul of Western Ga. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Trust Co. Bank of Augusta N.A. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Hubacher v. Volkswagen Central, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API