Stettine v. County of Suffolk
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentSimons, J.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the judgment of Special Term granting plaintiff summary judgment and declaring the agreement between defendant County and defendant Suffolk County Chapter of CSEA Local 852 void should be reinstated. The agreement is void because it was negotiated by defendant Farnetti, who ostensibly represented the County and its taxpayers, and at the same time had a prohibited interest in the outcome of the negotiations because increases in his own salary were linked to any increase in salary which he agreed the County would pay to employees…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Smith v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Landau v. PercaccioloNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Landau v. PercaccioloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- De Perno v. DulanNew York Court of Appeals · 1961