Legal Opinion
Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 26, 1983No. Court 82-11-01497PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Judge:
Introduction
This action raises a first impression question of vital concern in the administration of our countervailing duty law.
Plaintiff seeks an order in the nature of mandamus compelling the International Trade Administration of the United States Department of Commerce (“ITA”) to reduce the estimated countervailing duty cash deposit rate on imports of ceramic tile from Mexico. 1 These estimated duties are being collected in accordance with a countervailing duty order and underlying final affirmative countervailing duty determination published by ITA on May 10, 1982 (47 FR…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Uniroyal, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Royal Business MacHines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1980
- American Air Parcel Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Badger-Powhatan, a Div. of Figgie Intern. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- J.S. Stone, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- UST, INC. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Vivitar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.