Legal Opinion

Long v. Baxter

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for the annulment of a marriage.

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.

Plaintiff is the mother of defendant Bohert P. Baxter, and brings this action for an annulment of the marriage between the defendants under the provisions of sections 1743 and 1744 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Both defendants were under the age of eighteen years at the time of their marriage; the defendant Bobert P. Baxter is now over, and the defendant Bose M. Baxter is still under, that age, and it is undisputed that after the defendant Bobert attained the age of eighteen years the defendants freely lived and cohabited together as husband and wife for a period of about twenty-seven days.

Pr…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Earle v. EarleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Herrman v. HerrmanNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. SmithaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API