Legal Opinion

Brooks Supply Co. v. Hines

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 5, 1920No. 9350PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

As finally presented and so far as is necessary to an understanding of our conclusions, this suit was prosecuted by defendants in error, H. B. Hines and H. A. Martin, against plaintiff in error, the Brooks Supply Company of Beaumont, Tex., for a refusal to deliver, in accordance with the terms of a certain contract,.-a certain oildrilling rig. The plaintiffs alleged that they had purchased the drilling rig referred to from the Brooks Supply Company of Beaumont for the sum of $4,000, to be paid as follows: $1,000 in cash and six notes of $500 each, drawing interest at the rate of 8 per cent.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. BelcherTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bourland v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Elliott v. Jackson Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API