Legal Opinion

Villari v. Terminix International, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 1988No. Civ. A. 85-1363PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

This is a diversity action in which plaintiffs, the Villari family, allege that defendant pest control corporation, Terminix Inc. (“Terminix”), contaminated their home with termiticides. The defendants have submitted several motions in limine relating to the admissibility of certain evidence. This Memorandum addresses each of these motions.

I. Motion to Exclude Certain Animal Experiments from Evidence on the Issue of the Human Carcinogenicity of Aldrin, Dieldrin, Chlordane & Heptachlor

In the first motion, the defendant seeks to exclude from evidence…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Auvil v. CBS "60 Minutes"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Siharath v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
  5. Conde v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API