Legal Opinion
Murdock v. Security State Bank of Harlem (In Re Murdock)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana
Decided December 6, 1991No. 2:19-bk-60136PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHN L. PETERSON, Bankruptcy Judge.
In this adversary proceeding, the Plaintiff, former spouse of the Debtor, Rolland B. Murdock, seeks marshaling of assets to satisfy claims of secured lienholders pursuant to Mont.Code Ann. 31-2-105. After the answer by the Chapter 7 Trustee, who asserted an affirmative defense for marshaling in his favor, and Defendant Security State Bank of Harlem (Bank), the matter was set for trial, whereupon the parties submitted the record on stipulated facts. The Debtor did not appear and his default has been entered as he has no interest in the matter. Briefs…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Meyer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sowell v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chittenden Trust Co. v. Sebert Lumber, Co. (In Re Vermont Toy Works, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1987
- Victor Gruen Associates, Inc. v. Morris M. Glass and Hilda Glass, Irving Sulmeyer, Receiver, California Federal Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Duck v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'n (In Re Spectra Prism Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re KerbsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1997
- In Re BorgesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1995