Legal Opinion

Mulhall v. Sheraton Needham Hotel

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided November 17, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.

This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A D. A., Rule 8C, appeal of the dismissal of the plaintiff’s action on the ground that it was barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

The dispositive facts are undisputed. Plaintiff John G. Mulhall (“Mulhall”) worked as a banquet server for the defendant, Sheraton Needham Hotel (“Sheraton”), from February 10, 1997 through February 12, 1999. During this period, Sheraton charged its banquet customers a service charge. Mulhall claimed that this service charge consisted of, or included, gratuities, and that Sheraton owed him his portion of the service charges…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Migliore v. Purity Supreme Supermarkets, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldman & Pease, LLC v. CollinsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API