Legal Opinion

Hartford Bank v. Green

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 15, 1861PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Des Moines District Court. The facts are fully stated in the opinion, of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover of Key, Foster, et al, as makers, and of Green, Thomas & Co., as indorsers, of a promissory note which reads as,follows:

Burlington, Dec. 5th, 1857.

Twelve months after date we promise to pay to the order of Green, Thomas & Co., one thousand dollars currency, value received with ten per cent interestafter maturity.

(Signed,) Charles Foster,

A. Key, and others.

(Indorsed,) Green, Thomas & Co.

In order to show such diligence against the makers as to charge the indorsers, the plaintiff in the petition alleges that the defendants by their said undertaking agreed to pay…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. KetchamNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  2. Barnwell v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1819
  3. President of the Bank of Utica v. De MottNew York Supreme Court · 1816

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parker v. . StroudNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Haber v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Graul v. StrutzelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  4. Wallace v. TinneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Closz & Mickelson v. MiracleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API