Rogers v. Ingersoll
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from Judgment on Report of Referee. Action by John Z. Rogers and others against Robert H. Ingersoll and another on a demand attached. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.
This action was tried before a referee. A large part of the record is taken up by objections taken and the arguments thereon by the defendants’ counsel, most of which are absolutely frivolous, repeated again and again, and now insisted on; the appellants’ brief stating, “Therefore the appellants note the fact here that every objection in the case is good ground for reversal.” It would be a waste of time to discuss most of these objections, and all that I shall attempt to do is to point out what appears to be the real questions in the case.
The action is brought by the plaintiffs as attachment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cronin v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Stone v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- King v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Ross v. IngersollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900