Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Laberee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1911No. 1,874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The writ of error presents the question of law whether, upon the facts proven under the issues, it is shown that the indebtedness of the plaintiff in error to the Construction Company had been paid or satisfied. There is no evidence of an agreement between the parties that the notes were received as payment of the debt. In the absence of such an agreement, the common-law rule prevails in nearly all of the states and is adopted in the federal courts that the original demand is not paid or extinguished by the note. Peter v. Beverly, 10 Pet. 532, 9 L.Ed. 522;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bank of the United States v. DANIELSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Lyman v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  3. Vermont & Canada Railroad v. Vermont Central RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873
  4. Atlas S. S. Co. v. Colombian Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
  5. Sercomb v. CatlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Receivers Middlesex Banking Co. v. Realty Investment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Primos Chemical Co. v. Fulton Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1918
  3. Union Guardian Trust Co. v. Detroit Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  4. Donna B. Welch v. Atlas Turner, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API