Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dailey v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2011No. 20110014Published

1DissentVande Walle, Chief Justice

[¶ 14] I respectfully dissent because I believe the majority attributes words to N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-06.1(1), the governing statute, that are not in the statute.

[¶ 15] The majority reads the words “release from incarceration” in the statute to necessarily mean release from incarceration “for the same offense,” words not contained in the statute. I would not conclude the legislative branch in enacting § 12.1-32-06.1(1) did not realize that a person might be incarcerated for more than one crime at the same time. Assuming, as I do, the lack of that naivete, the Legislature nevertheless did not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. DaileyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. RothNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. BergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API