Moseley v. Shepherd
Supreme Court of Florida
Appeal from the judgment of late Superior Court for Leon County. The following tabular statement will show the different executions, which came to the hands of the Marshal, against the executors of A. M. Gatlin, and the endorsements on each of them: On 28th April, -1845, Willis, plaintiff in execution, No. 2981, took a rule on the Marshal, to show cause why he should not pay over to him the moneys arising from sale of the mules, corn and fodder, sold on 1st Monday in…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the judgment of late Superior Court for Leon County. The following tabular statement will show the different executions, which came to the hands of the Marshal, against the executors of A. M. Gatlin, and the endorsements on each of them: On 28th April, -1845, Willis, plaintiff in execution, No. 2981, took a rule on the Marshal, to show cause why he should not pay over to him the moneys arising from sale of the mules, corn and fodder, sold on 1st Monday in January, under and by virtue of executions in his hand, as the property of the estate of Gatlin. On same day Moseley,…
1Opinion of the Court
Baltzem., Justice:
Two rules were taken in the Court below,' by different counsel," against John G, Camp, as follows: . "
Jessse H. Willis, 1 vs. >
Lamb, Ex’r of Gatlin, dec’d. ) And now, on this 28th" day of A* pril, 1845, on motion of Thompson & Hagner, of counsel for plaintiff, it is ordered, that John G. Camp, Esq., Marshal of the Middle Bis-*158trict, do show cause on to-morrow morning, why he should not pay over to the plaintiff in this execution, the moneys arising from the sale of the mules, and corn and fodder, sold on the 1st Monday of January last, as the property of the estate of Gatlin,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- County of Okeechobee v. Fla. Natl. Bank of JaxSupreme Court of Florida · 1933