Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Southern Trust Insurance v. Center Developers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1995No. A94A2583 to A94A2591Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSmith, Judge

I concur in certain portions of the majority’s judgment, but for different reasons. I respectfully dissent as to other portions of the ma*223jority opinion.

1. I agree with the majority’s holding in Division 3, albeit for a different reason: Glazer v. Crescent Wallcoverings, 215 Ga. App. 492 (451 SE2d 509) (1994), is inapplicable to the May Company claim; and summary judgment was therefore inappropriate as to the May Company.

The “loss and damage” clause in the May Company lease provides that “subject to the provisions of Section 11.3 [the ‘waiver of subrogation’ clause], tenant covenants and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tuxedo Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Lie-NielsenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Glazer v. Crescent Wallcoverings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Alimenta Processing Corp. v. South Georgia Pecan Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Ft. Oglethorpe Assoc. v. HAILS CONSTR.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API