Legal Opinion

Hoekstra v. Byker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1951No. Docket No. 87, Calendar No. 44,942PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

Plaintiff had verdict by jury followed by entry of judgment against the defendant for damages resulting from his negligence in the operation of a motor vehicle. Thereafter the defendant filed a motion to set aside the verdict and judgment and for a new trial on the grounds that (1) the verdict was against the great weight of the evidence, (2) that the verdict was excessive, and (3) that the defendant was a minor at the time process was served and also at the time of the trial, and that no guardian ad litem had been appointed for him (CL 1948, § 612.30 [Stat Ann § 27.682]). The motion was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Steggles v. National Discount Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Curtis v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Home Life Ins. Co. v. CohenMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Toledo Pipe Organ Co. v. Paradise Theatre Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. First State Bank v. SolomonMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Great Lakes Realty Corp. v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API