Hoekstra v. Byker
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.
Plaintiff had verdict by jury followed by entry of judgment against the defendant for damages resulting from his negligence in the operation of a motor vehicle. Thereafter the defendant filed a motion to set aside the verdict and judgment and for a new trial on the grounds that (1) the verdict was against the great weight of the evidence, (2) that the verdict was excessive, and (3) that the defendant was a minor at the time process was served and also at the time of the trial, and that no guardian ad litem had been appointed for him (CL 1948, § 612.30 [Stat Ann § 27.682]). The motion was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Steggles v. National Discount Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Curtis v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Home Life Ins. Co. v. CohenMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Toledo Pipe Organ Co. v. Paradise Theatre Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
- First State Bank v. SolomonMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by1 opinion
- Great Lakes Realty Corp. v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1953