Legal Opinion

Claim of Lane v. Rotodyne, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 25, 1979PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herlihy, J.

The claimant has been awarded supplemental benefits pursuant to section 15 (subd 3, par v) of the Workers’ Compensation Law (hereinafter referred to as section 15). The appel*154lants first object upon the ground that there must be a showing that wage earning capacity was impaired solely by claimant’s accidental injury of November 18, 1970.

As applicable to this case, section 15 provides, in part, as follows: "v. Additional compensation for impairment of wage earning capacity in certain permanent partial disabilities. Notwithstanding any other provision of this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ortiz v. Berkel Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Fortuna v. Pfizer, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Claim of Lee v. Weiss & Sons Paper & Twine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API