Legal Opinion

Canada Sugar-Refining Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 3, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

On April 29, 1898, the respondent company insured for the libelant’s benefit:

“$15,000 on profits on cargo sugar; against total loss only; valued at sum insured; shipped on hoard the British ship John B. Sayre at and from Iloilo to Montreal.”

At that time the Sayre was at sea prosecuting the voyage.. The libelant had 2,462 tons of sugars on board of her, amounting in value to $181,000, and had just completed insurance of the sugars to the amount of $166,145 in the.Atlantic Mutual, of which insurance the respondent was informed before its insurance on profits was made. In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mumford v. HallettNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  2. Tom v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1805

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lenfest v. ColdwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Inez H. Lenfest and Marine Midland Grace Trust Company of New York, as Executors of the Estate of Harold C. Lenfest, and Kenneth F. Yarrington v. Harold W. Coldwell, Ferro--Bet Corporation of America v. Harold W. ColdwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API