Martinez v. Royal-Pak Systems
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered August 15, 2002, which, upon the parties’ respective motions to reargue a prior order setting aside the jury’s award of past lost earnings and directing a new trial thereon, dismissed the claim for past lost earnings as a matter of law, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs testimony as to his past earnings, unsubstantiated by tax returns, W-2 forms or other relevant documents, was insufficient, as a matter of law, to show any loss of past earnings (see DelValle v White Castle Sys., 277 AD2d 13; Razzaque v Krakow Taxi,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Razzaque v. Krakow Taxi, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Gomez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- DelValle v. White Castle System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by4 opinions
- St. Hilaire v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Orellano v. 29 East 37th Street Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Kye Yong Kim v. 40th AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Sdregas v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003