Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Royal-Pak Systems

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 24, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered August 15, 2002, which, upon the parties’ respective motions to reargue a prior order setting aside the jury’s award of past lost earnings and directing a new trial thereon, dismissed the claim for past lost earnings as a matter of law, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs testimony as to his past earnings, unsubstantiated by tax returns, W-2 forms or other relevant documents, was insufficient, as a matter of law, to show any loss of past earnings (see DelValle v White Castle Sys., 277 AD2d 13; Razzaque v Krakow Taxi,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Razzaque v. Krakow Taxi, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Gomez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. DelValle v. White Castle System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. St. Hilaire v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Orellano v. 29 East 37th Street Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Kye Yong Kim v. 40th AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Sdregas v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API