Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1996No. 69022PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINBARD, Presiding Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand.

On August 30, 1994, movant entered an Alford,1 plea to possession of a controlled substance in a correctional institution, § 217.360, RSMo Supp.1992. The prosecutor stated that the evidence would have shown that on October 10, 1993, a correctional officer strip-searched movant following movant’s meeting with a visitor and discovered three balloons containing marijuana. Pursuant to the terms of a plea agreement, the court sentenced…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Vernor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Fox v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Lane v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Hicks v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Walter D. Combs v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API