Hicks v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
REINBARD, Presiding Judge.
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand.
On August 30, 1994, movant entered an Alford,1 plea to possession of a controlled substance in a correctional institution, § 217.360, RSMo Supp.1992. The prosecutor stated that the evidence would have shown that on October 10, 1993, a correctional officer strip-searched movant following movant’s meeting with a visitor and discovered three balloons containing marijuana. Pursuant to the terms of a plea agreement, the court sentenced…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Vernor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Fox v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hill v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Lane v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Hicks v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Walter D. Combs v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021