Hague v. Hague
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The husband appeals the award (as lump sum alimony) of his one-half interest in the marital home of the parties and also the award of permanent alimony to the wife.
As to the lump sum award of the home, we affirm. See the conclusion and opinion expressed on motion for rehearing in MacDonald v. MacDonald, 382 So.2d 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), wherein the Second District Court of Appeal said, in referring to the opinion of the Supreme Court in Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980):
“. . . while not referring to the cases by name . . . clearly tempered the requirement of a positive showing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Herzog v. HerzogSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Cummings v. CummingsSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Blum v. BlumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rosen v. RosenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Seum v. SeumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Minniti v. MinnitiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Villano v. VillanoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982