Legal Opinion
Luchte v. State Automobile Mutual Ins
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 14, 1935No. 4676PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HAMILTON, PJ.
It must be borne in mind that the law is, that even though the trial of the case might have developed no liability on the part of the Insurancve Company, it would not. relieve the Insurance Company from defending the suit, if, as above stated, the petition alleged a case covered by the policy.
In the case of Bloom-Rosenblum-Kline Co. v Union Indemnity Co., 121 Oh St, 220, at page 226, the court in the opinion states:
“The contract of the company does not contemplate that its duty arises subsequent to the trial of such case and a final determination of the question of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Panhandle Steel Products Co. v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
3Cited by17 opinions
- Schmidt v. Utilities Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Pacific Automobile Ins. v. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. C. B. White & Bros.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948
- Merchants Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1939
- Owens v. the Ocean Accident Guarantee Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.