Legal Opinion

Holliday v. McGraw

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This is a suit in equity to establish the rights of the plaintiff and the defendant McGraw, as assignee, under and pursuant to an agreement in writing made and entered into by them on the 22d day of June, 1917, and .to a trust fund deposited thereunder, and for the distribution thereof, and the issues were tried at the Brie Special Term for the trial of issues of fact without a jury for May, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtLaughlin, J.

On the 7th day of May, 1912, the assignor, George H. Worthington, was the owner of a large and valuable collection of postage stamps, mounted in about sixty volumes, known as the Worthington Collection, and on that day he executed a mortgage thereon to the plaintiff, as collateral security for his promissory note, payable to her, bearing even date therewith, for $337,500, payable on or before two years from date. The consideration for the note was a loan of 1,500 shares of the common stock of the American Chicle Company, then owned by and in possession of the plaintiff, the market value of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. . Mail Express Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Bragelman v. . DaueNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Edwards & Beardsley v. Cottrell & BabcockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. Stoddard v. DenisonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1869
  5. Williams v. HatchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1862

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arn v. Operators Royalty & Producing Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API