CMI Roadbuilding Inc v. Specsys Inc
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CMI ROADBUILDING, INC., and ) CMI ROADBUILDING, LTD., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) Case No. CIV-18-1245-G ) SPECSYS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Now before the Court is the parties’ Second Amended Final Pretrial Report (“Final Pretrial Report”). See Doc. No. 381. Plaintiffs have filed Objections (Doc. No. 404), to which SpecSys has responded (Doc. No. 407). For the reasons set forth below, the Court overrules Plaintiffs’ objections and approves and adopts the Final Pretrial Report. See LCvR 16.1(c)(2). Plaintiffs first complain that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilson v. MuckalaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Gloria Rios v. F. Calvin Bigler, M.D. And Lauren A. Welch, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Hammad v. Bombardier Learjet, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002