Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Ponds

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1975No. Appeal, 260Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

The sole issue in the instant case is whether an inoperable sawed-off shotgun is an offensive weapon under §908 of the Crimes Code.1

Section 908 of the Crimes Code provides: “(a) ... A person commits a misdemeanor of the first degree if, except as authorized by law, he makes repairs, sells or otherwise deals in, uses, or possesses any offensive weapon. . . .

“(c) ... As used in this section ‘offensive weapon’ means any bomb, grenade, machine gun, sawed-off shotgun, firearm specially made or specially adapted for concealment of silent discharge, any blackjack,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. LaytonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. In Re Estate of SedmakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API