In Re the Marriage of Beadle

specially concurring.

¶45 I concur with the result of the majority opinion. I do not agree with all that is said therein.

¶46 Although I understand that the majority’s purpose during its discussion of Issue 3 is to simply distinguish between vested remainders and contingent remainders for the purpose of evaluating the certainty with which a future interest will be realized, I am concerned that language in the majority opinion infers that gifted or devised property which is vested is automatically included in the marital estate. Whether or not gifted, devised, or preacquired property is included…