Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Blue Ridge-Winkler Textiles

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1981No. Civ. A. No. 81-0950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

The federal labor policy favoring arbitration as the mode which the parties to a collective bargaining agreement have selected to resolve disputes renders “narrow in the extreme” the permissible scope of judicial review of an arbitration award,1 which will be sustained as long as it “draws its essence” from the collective bargaining agreement.2 That is, whenever the arbitrator’s conclusion can “in any rational way be derived from the agreement”, a reviewing court will not disturb the award3 unless the arbitrator manifestly disregards the agreement…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Super Tire Engineering Co. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 676District Court, D. New Jersey · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API