Jensen v. Union Paving Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
In an action for breach of an alleged oral contract, the superior court rendered judgment that plaintiff take nothing. Plaintiff appealed.
*638Question Presented
Plaintiff recognizes the well established rule that all reasonable inferences are to be indulged in support of the judgment and that, in order to reverse it, this court must hold that there is no substantial evidence to support the judgment. Plaintiff contends that there is no such evidence in this case. There is no merit to this appeal. In his opening brief, plaintiff quotes merely the evidence favorable to his contention, completely…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- MacDiarmid v. McDevittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929