Legal Opinion

Estate of Howey v. Commercial National Bank

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The theory upon which the appellant seeks to obtain possession of the money in question is based on the claim of the bank’s acceptance of the executorship. If it may be held that the bank acted as executor of deceased’s estate, then any debt which it owed to deceased as a bank yvould, ipso facto, become a cash asset in its hands as executor. It would be obliged to turn over to • appellant, as succeeding representative, the cash representing the amount of indebtedness. The court found that the bank at no time took any affirmative action pursuant to said appointment, that the estate, so far as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lynch v. DivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Estate of Robinson v. HodgkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Will of Stubbs v. First National Bank of MenomonieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adamson v. HennessySupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Guardianship of KueschelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Estate of TuttleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API