Legal Opinion

State v. Graham

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 16, 1985No. C4-84-1905PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

The State appeals dismissal of a charge of assault in the second degree, assault with a dangerous weapon. The trial court ruled that the definition of dangerous weapon in Minn.Stat. § 609.02, subd. 6 (1982), was unconstitutional because it was vague and diluted the State’s burden of proof. We reverse and remand for trial.

FACTS

On March 7, 1984 respondent Thomas Elmer Graham allegedly struck Suzanne Olson on the face, legs, and arms with a four-foot metal floor lamp with a large metal base. They had shared living quarters intermittently for approximately two years. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. State v. TibbettsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ArchambeauCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  2. State v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. TiceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. State v. BauerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  5. State v. GebremariamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API