Tobey v. Wood
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.
This is an action of contract upon two checks, dated respectively December 2,1872, and January 3,1873, signed by Seth Wood & Co., and duly presented for payment, and protested for non-payment.
The defendant Humes, the only one of the signers who defends the action, was a member of the firm of Seth Wood & Co., and, when the checks were drawn, was an infant. His promise to pay the checks, therefore, was a voidable contract, *89and the burden of proof is upon the plaintiff to show that Humes, after he became of age, affirmed and ratified the contract. 2 Greenl. Ev. § 367, and cases cited. Reed v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chandler v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Minock v. ShortridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Todd v. ClappMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Crabtree v. MayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1841
3Cited by11 opinions
- Adamowski v. Curtiss-Wright Flying Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Welch v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Glidden v. ChamberlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Buchanan v. HubbardIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Perkins v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.