Legal Opinion

Vance v. Campbell's Heirs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 2, 1833PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Chancert.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

As one object of the bill filed in this case by the appel-lees, was to obtain a distribution of the personal estate of their father, and a settlement of the accounts of the personal representatives, James Campbell, the executor, was a necessary party ; and consequently, as he was not made a party, the decree against the executrix, must, for that cause, be reversed.

But it becomes our duty also to notice an error to the prejudice of the appellees.

John G. Campbell, father of the appellees, and husband of the appellant Anne, the executrix, devised to his wife his whole estate during her life or…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harmon v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Hibbits v. JackIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Smith v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Coppage v. Alexander's HeirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1842
  5. Watson v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API