Plunkett v. Supreme Conclave
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of tlie Circuit Court of the city of Richmond, in an action at law on an insurance policy. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.
1Opinion of the Court
Keith, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
“It appears from the record that Charles "VV. Plunkett applied for membership in the Improved Order Heptasophs on June 28, 1897, .and in his application he agreed ‘to' conform in all respects to the laws, rules and usages of the order now in force, or which may hereafter be adopted by the same.’ Upon said application he was admitted as a member, and on the 12th day of August, 1897, a benefit certificate for the sum of two thousand ($2,000) dollars was issued to him, his wife, Estelle V. Plunkett, beneficiary. This certificate was delivered and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grin v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Ritter v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Supreme Commandery of the Knights of the Golden Rule v. AinsworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Burt v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Shipman v. . Protected Home CircleNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Eagle, Star & British Dominions Insurance v. HellerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Wackwitz v. RoySupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
- Scarborough v. American National InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Williamson v. City of Virginia Beach, Va.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
- Olson v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.