Legal Opinion
Ostrow Pharmacies, Inc. v. Beal
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 4, 1975No. Civ. A. 75-158PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BRODERICK, District Judge.
This is an action in which the plaintiffs, six pharmacies in the city of Philadelphia, seek to enjoin the defendants from proceeding under the terms of a contract entered into between Paid Prescriptions, Inc. (PAID) and the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare (DPW), which contract was to take effect February 1, 1975. On January 20, 1975, the plaintiffs filed their complaint invoking jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, alleging a federal question and damages in excess of $10,000.-00. Plaintiffs’ cause of action is based on Title XIX…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ohio Hospital Ass'n v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Bracco v. LacknerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
- District of Columbia Podiatry Society v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
- Hempstead General Hospital v. WhalenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
- Pennsylvania Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Department of Public WelfareDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.