Legal Opinion
Badham v. United States District Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 26, 1983No. 83-7487PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Registered Republican voters in several congressional districts in the State of California (the Republicans) challenge California Assembly Bill 2X, a congressional redistricting bill, on several state and federal constitutional grounds. A statement of the facts is contained in the district court’s disposition, which follows this opinion. Employing the doctrine of Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co., 312 U.S. 496, 61 S.Ct. 643, 85 L.Ed. 971 (1941) (Pullman), the three-judge district court stayed the action pending resolution of the state law issues in state court. The…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Richard Mazanec v. North Judson-San Pierre School CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Robert E. Badham v. United States District Court For The Northern District Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983