Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bruton v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1945Published

1ConcurrenceBarnhill, J.

I concur in the majority conclusion, but I cannot agree that a party may not become liable in damages for inducing, or conspiring with, another to breach a contract. The books are full of cases to the contrary. Anno. 84 A. L. R., 43, et seq.

The weight of authority supports the- rule that an action will lie against a person who, otherwise than in a legitimate exercise of his own rights, procures the breach of a contract. Moreover, interference with contract relations includes not merely the procurement of the breach of contract, but all invasions of contract relations, including any act…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Collins v. Davis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Turner v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Haskins v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  4. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Byers v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API