Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ohio Oil Co. v. Sharp

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1943No. 2635Published

1ConcurrencePhillips, Circuit Judge

The Ohio Oil Company will be referred to as Ohio and the General Geophysical Company as General.

The geological information obtained by General, acting as confidential contractor of Ohio, belonged to Ohio. In obtaining such information, Ohio did no wrong to Sharp, and was guilty of no inequitable conduct that in anywise affected Sharp. Sharp was then an entire stranger to the oil and gas rights then owned by his present lessors.

It is well settled that a party may have relief as to a transaction in itself untainted, although his title to the subject matter may have originally grown out of his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  3. Booth v. . R., W. O.T.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Benner v. Atlantic Dredging Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API