Cote v. Cote
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Dissent
MURRAY, Chief Justice.
I do not concur with the opinion of the majority.
Appellent’s first point is that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment of divorce, and that appellee failed to establish her allegations by full and satisfactory evidence.
Anne M. Cote was called as a witness and by her evidence, in my opinion, she failed to establish grounds for divorce. She testified that she and her husband had been talking of a divorce for several years, and this past August (Aug. 1964) it was finally discussed, but she did not want to take any action until after the holidays. She knew…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNabb v. McNabbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Meyer v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Rowden v. RowdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Ballard v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Bell v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.